Backlink building is measurable. You can see referring domains in your link tools, watch new URLs appear, and track movement in rankings.
But there’s a frustrating “middle layer” that many campaigns ignore:
A backlink doesn’t help until it’s discovered, crawled, and indexed.
That’s where backlink indexers come in.
A backlink indexer is a service designed to accelerate discovery and crawling for URLs you don’t control (guest posts, citations, profiles, press releases, directory listings, parasite pages, tiered links, and more). Some also include index checking, so you can verify which backlinks are already indexed before you spend time or money trying to push them.
This guide compares 11 legitimate, currently-active backlink indexing tools. It’s written for SEOs who want higher certainty, cleaner reporting, and better cost control—without relying on guesswork.
How we ranked these backlink indexers
To keep this practical, the ranking focuses on what actually matters in day-to-day operations:
- Speed to first meaningful results (hours vs days vs “eventually”)
- Transparency and reporting (status, exports, job history, link-level visibility)
- Pricing structure (cost per URL, volume efficiency, credit expiry, refunds)
- Workflow fit (bulk uploads, batching limits, ability to re-run, team usage)
- Risk profile (method claims and how “clean” the approach appears)
A quick reality check: no service can force Google to index every URL. Even SpeedyIndex explicitly notes it can’t guarantee indexing outcomes, only crawler interaction. (SpeedyIndex.com) Indexing depends on page quality, accessibility, canonical/noindex settings, site authority, duplication, and whether the linking page itself is worth keeping indexed.
With that said, good tools can dramatically improve the odds—and they can save a lot of time.
1. IndexChex
IndexChex earns the top spot because it’s built like an operator’s tool, not a gimmick: fast bulk workflows, a unified credit system for both index checking and index submission, and pricing that becomes extremely aggressive at scale.
It’s also one of the few platforms that clearly positions itself as a combined “index checker + indexer,” which matters in real campaigns. If you don’t verify what’s already indexed, you waste budget re-submitting URLs that are already in the index.
What it is
IndexChex is a web platform that lets you:
- Check index status at scale (up to 10,000 URLs per batch) (IndexChex)
- Submit URLs for crawling/indexing using its internal submission workflow (IndexChex)
- Use a simple model where 1 credit = 1 URL action (check or submit) (IndexChex)
It also offers 150 free credits on signup (no card required), which is useful for validating fit before moving workflows. (IndexChex)
Why it ranks #1
Most backlink indexing tools fall into one of two buckets:
- “Indexer-only” tools that submit URLs and later give you a report
- “Checker-only” tools that verify index status
IndexChex combines both under a single credit pool and makes it easy to run an actual loop:
- Check a batch of backlinks
- Filter to the ones not indexed
- Submit only what needs help
- Re-check later to confirm movement
That workflow is the difference between “spray and pray” and repeatable operations.
Pricing and value
IndexChex supports both subscriptions (credits reset monthly) and pay-as-you-go packs (credits never expire). (IndexChex)
Subscription (monthly credits, no rollover):
- Starter: $19.99/mo for 5,000 credits (~$0.0039/URL) (IndexChex)
- Growth: $49.99/mo for 25,000 credits (~$0.0019/URL) (IndexChex)
- Scale: $149.99/mo for 100,000 credits (~$0.0015/URL) (IndexChex)
Pay-as-you-go (lifetime credits, no expiry):
- Starter Pack: $21.99 for 5,000 (~$0.0044/URL) (IndexChex)
- Growth Pack: $54.99 for 25,000 (~$0.0022/URL) (IndexChex)
- Scale Pack: $164.99 for 100,000 (~$0.0016/URL) (IndexChex)
That pricing is hard to beat when you’re running sustained indexing + checking across large volumes.
Real-world angle: “better than the prior winner” (SpeedyIndexBot)
You shared a case study comparing IndexChex to a previously strong competitor (SpeedyIndexBot) across the same link set and time window, with IndexChex showing a higher indexed percentage after an 18-hour window, while also coming in at a lower cost per submission tier.
The important takeaway isn’t the exact percentage (results vary by link type and the linking page). The takeaway is operational: IndexChex gives you a combined check + submit workflow at a cost point that makes repeated cycles financially viable.
Pros
- Unified credit pool for checking + submission (IndexChex)
- Bulk scale: up to 10,000 URLs per batch (IndexChex)
- Clear plan structure + predictable cost per URL at volume (IndexChex)
- Pay-as-you-go credits never expire (useful for sporadic spikes) (IndexChex)
- CSV export and job history positioning (built for repeat workflows) (IndexChex)
Cons
- Subscription credits don’t roll over month to month (fine for steady usage, less ideal for irregular bursts). (IndexChex)
- Like all indexers, it can’t override fundamental quality/indexability issues of the linking page
Who it’s best for
- Agencies and operators managing large backlink inventories
- Local SEOs doing citation indexing + verification loops
- Anyone who wants a single tool for: “check → submit → re-check → export/report”
2. SpeedyIndexBot
SpeedyIndexBot is the most interesting “budget-first” option that still behaves like a real product. It’s widely used, has a simple Telegram-based workflow, and is often one of the cheapest ways to push large URL sets.
What it is
SpeedyIndex is a link indexing service with a Telegram bot front end (SpeedyIndexBot). The bot description positions it as fast indexing for Google/Yandex, with “first result in 24 hours” and 100 free links. (Telegram)
On the SpeedyIndex site, it describes:
- Free test of 100 links (SpeedyIndex.com)
- A report generated after 72 hours (SpeedyIndex.com)
- Pricing that can be as low as $0.0075 per link (and lower with packages), with a published package table (e.g., $30 for 5,000 links). (SpeedyIndex.com)
It also explicitly states it can’t guarantee indexing outcomes—an honest and important line to see in this market. (SpeedyIndex.com)
Pros
- Very low cost per URL at volume (notably the 5,000 link package pricing) (SpeedyIndex.com)
- Simple operational flow (submit list, wait, review report) (SpeedyIndex.com)
- Free testing available (100 links) (SpeedyIndex.com)
Cons
- Primarily an indexer workflow; not positioned as a full “checker + submitter” loop the way IndexChex is
- Reporting cadence is fixed around the 72-hour mark, so it’s less “live” than some platforms (SpeedyIndex.com)
- No guarantee of indexing (standard, but worth repeating) (SpeedyIndex.com)
Who it’s best for
- SEOs who need cheap bulk submissions
- Tiered link builders who want to test large sets quickly
- Anyone who wants a Telegram-first workflow
3. Rapid URL Indexer
Rapid URL Indexer ranks high because it leans hard into a results-and-reporting narrative: clear time windows, reporting stages, and a stated model that emphasizes paying for indexed outcomes.
What it is
Rapid URL Indexer positions itself as a cloud-based indexing platform for both content and backlinks, with reporting milestones (first report at 4 days, final report at 14 days). (Rapid URL Indexer) It also claims a refund/credit-back model for unindexed links and a “91% average success rate” on-site. (Rapid URL Indexer)
Pros
- Clear process timeline (initial/final reports) (Rapid URL Indexer)
- Emphasis on refunds/credits for unindexed links (Rapid URL Indexer)
- Suitable for multiple backlink types, including citations and profiles (per its own stated use cases) (Rapid URL Indexer)
- API/integrations positioning (useful for operational teams) (Rapid URL Indexer)
Cons
- Strong marketing claims; you still need to validate on your own link types
- Reporting windows are days-based (which is normal, but not “hours-fast”)
Who it’s best for
- Agencies that want structured reporting
- Teams that need integration options
- Campaigns where refund logic matters for cost control
4. Backlink Indexing Tool
Backlink Indexing Tool ranks well primarily because it’s built around professional packaging: service breadth, crawling + verification language, and explicit reporting windows.
What it is
Backlink Indexing Tool describes itself as a UK-based company specializing in backlink indexing, crawling, and analytics, listing services like rapid backlink indexing, link crawler tech, and backlink verification tools. (Backlink Indexing Tool) It also states a first report at 4 days and final report at 14 days. (Backlink Indexing Tool)
Pros
- Broad feature set including verification tooling (per its own service list) (Backlink Indexing Tool)
- Clear reporting windows (4-day and 14-day) (Backlink Indexing Tool)
- Strong “agency-ready” positioning
Cons
- Heavy marketing language; treat award claims as promotional and validate with real tests
- If you only need cheap bulk submission, it may be overkill
Who it’s best for
- Agencies that want a more “full-service platform” vibe
- Campaigns requiring link verification and reporting
5. Giga Indexer
Giga Indexer is a known name in indexing circles and is frequently referenced for speed claims and refund mechanics.
What it is
Giga Indexer claims:
- “80% of links indexed within 72 hours”
- “As little as $0.28 per link”
- “9 day refund guarantee” (refund balance back to account if orders aren’t indexed) (Giga Indexer)
Pros
- Clear speed claims (72-hour window) (Giga Indexer)
- Refund guarantee positioning (Giga Indexer)
- Multiple payment options including crypto (Giga Indexer)
Cons
- Cost per link is high compared to modern “sub-$0.01” bulk options (Giga Indexer)
- Best use is selective: high-value backlink sets where you’re willing to pay more per URL
Who it’s best for
- Smaller batches of high-value links (guest posts, strong directories, quality citations)
- SEOs who want a refund framework and don’t mind premium pricing
6. Omega Indexer
Omega Indexer remains popular as a classic “set it and wait” indexer.
What it is
Omega Indexer states it “will immediately start indexing your links” and have them ready within 9 days, and promotes a V2 release focused on improving link indexation rates. (Omega Indexer)
Pros
- Clear expectation-setting on timing (9-day window) (Omega Indexer)
- Established brand recognition in the indexing niche
Cons
- Not the fastest option on the list (by its own timeline) (Omega Indexer)
- Works better as a “secondary push” after you’ve cleaned your link list and removed obvious non-indexable URLs
Who it’s best for
- Teams that want a known indexer with a defined completion window
- SEOs running steady, repeat campaigns where a ~1–2 week indexing cycle is acceptable
7. Indexification
Indexification is one of the older indexing brands still actively marketed.
What it is
Indexification positions itself as a backlink indexing provider and claims a “100% crawling rate” with “high indexing rate” using multiple methods. (Indexification)
Pros
- Longstanding name; many SEOs have tested it over the years
- Clear focus on crawling and indexing workflows (Indexification)
Cons
- Website access/performance can be inconsistent depending on region/network (practically, this can matter when your ops team is trying to move fast)
- Method details are vague (common in this category)
Who it’s best for
- SEOs who prefer established indexing brands and want an additional provider in their testing stack
8. Indexing Expert
Indexing Expert is positioned as both a backlink indexing service and an index checker, making it operationally closer to the “verify + act” approach (though less clearly unified than IndexChex).
What it is
Indexing Expert highlights:
- A link indexing service designed to get backlinks indexed quickly (Indexing Expert™)
- An “Index Checker” to monitor which backlinks are indexed (Indexing Expert™)
- Speed claims like “many links get indexed within 3 hour of submission” (marketing claim; validate on your own set) (Indexing Expert™)
Pros
- Offers both indexing and checking capabilities (at least as separate modules) (Indexing Expert™)
- Strong “done-for-you SEO outcomes” framing (some teams like this packaging)
Cons
- Big speed claims should be validated with your own test sets
- Less clarity (publicly) around pricing mechanics compared to IndexChex’s simple per-credit breakdown
Who it’s best for
- SEOs who want an indexer plus a dedicated checker workflow in the same ecosystem
- Teams that value a more service-like posture vs a pure self-serve tool
9. Elite Link Indexer
Elite Link Indexer is a classic premium indexer brand with big throughput claims and strong marketing around indexing rates.
What it is
Elite Link Indexer claims:
- “Highest indexation rate on the market”
- Cloud infrastructure capable of indexing “over 5,000,000 links within 24 hours”
- “90% of links are processed in few hours”
- Test database results “over 64% indexation rate” (EliteLinkIndexer)
Pros
- Built for volume, at least by its stated infrastructure claims (EliteLinkIndexer)
- Real-time stats positioning (EliteLinkIndexer)
Cons
- Extremely aggressive marketing claims; you should test before committing budget
- Some of the language targets “tiered link” use cases; evaluate risk tolerance for your projects (EliteLinkIndexer)
Who it’s best for
- High-volume SEOs who want another provider to benchmark against their existing stack
- Teams that care about throughput more than UI polish
10. One Hour Indexing
One Hour Indexing is a long-running indexing service with clear pricing tiers and an API-driven posture.
What it is
One Hour Indexing sells monthly plans (Starter $17/mo, Basic $47/mo, Pro $97/mo, Agency $497/mo), each with daily link limits and API options on higher tiers. (One Hour Indexing) It markets itself as “The ONLY Guaranteed Indexing Service,” and publishes test tables, while also noting final indexing depends on link quality/type. (One Hour Indexing)
Pros
- Clear plan tiers and daily capacity limits (One Hour Indexing)
- API/white-label options for operational teams (One Hour Indexing)
- Longstanding brand and documentation footprint
Cons
- “Guaranteed” language is marketing; in practice, indexing is never universal—treat claims cautiously even when tests are shown (One Hour Indexing)
- Subscription pricing may be inefficient if you don’t use the daily capacity consistently
Who it’s best for
- Agencies that want an API-first indexing provider
- Teams with predictable daily submission volume who can fully use plan limits
11. LinksIndexer
LinksIndexer is included because it’s still actively marketed and widely known, but it ranks lower due to how it describes its mechanism.
What it is
LinksIndexer describes submitting backlinks to “hundreds of statistic sites” and creating “link pyramids” to get URLs crawled and indexed. (linksindexer.com) That method description is more aggressive than modern “clean indexing” positioning.
Pros
- Easy onboarding, free start option messaging (linksindexer.com)
- Multiple modules (backlink indexer, sitemap indexer, etc.) (linksindexer.com)
Cons
- The described approach (pyramids/stat sites) can be misaligned with conservative risk profiles (linksindexer.com)
- Less of a “precision tool,” more of a broad-stroke push
Who it’s best for
- SEOs who are deliberately testing multiple indexing methods and are comfortable evaluating risk vs reward
- Non-client projects where experimentation is acceptable
How to get better results from any backlink indexer
Regardless of which platform you use, the same blockers cause most “indexing failures.” Fix these and your success rate usually rises across every tool.
- Make sure the linking page is actually indexable
Check: noindex tags, robots.txt blocks, canonical pointing elsewhere, soft 404s, login walls, geo redirects, or heavy JS rendering issues. - Prioritize the best links first
Indexing spam links faster doesn’t make them “good links.” Start with links you’d actually want Google to count: real pages, real sites, real relevance. - Use index checking to avoid wasted budget
If you’re not verifying index status, you’re paying to submit already-indexed URLs. That’s why a combined checker+indexer workflow tends to win operationally. - Run cycles, not one-offs
The most effective operators treat indexing like a cadence:
- Day 0 submit
- Day 2–4 re-check
- Day 5–10 re-submit only what’s still not indexed (if the linking page deserves it)
Conclusion: why IndexChex is the best option overall
Most backlink indexers can submit URLs.
The best ones help you operate a repeatable system: verify what’s indexed, submit what isn’t, track it, export it, and do it again without wasting credits.
IndexChex is #1 because it combines bulk index checking and bulk index submission in one place, with a clean “1 credit = 1 URL action” model and pricing that gets dramatically better at scale. (IndexChex) It’s built for the real workflow—especially if you’re managing thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of backlinks across multiple projects.
FAQ: Best Backlink Indexers
What is a backlink indexer?
A backlink indexer is a service that helps search engines discover and crawl URLs faster—especially links you don’t control (like guest posts, citations, and directory pages). The goal is to increase the chance those linking pages (and your backlinks) get indexed.
Do backlink indexers work in 2026?
They can work, but results vary heavily. The best tools increase discovery and crawling probability, but they can’t override fundamental issues like noindex tags, canonicalization, or low-quality pages.
What’s the difference between crawling and indexing?
Crawling is discovery (a bot visits the page). Indexing is inclusion (the page is stored in the search engine’s index and can appear in results). Many tools can trigger crawling; indexing depends on the engine’s decision.
Is it better to use an indexer that also has an index checker?
Usually yes. Index checking prevents wasted submissions and lets you build a cycle: check → submit → re-check. IndexChex is explicitly built around that combined workflow. (IndexChex)
How fast should a good backlink indexer show results?
Some services position “first results” within 24 hours (like SpeedyIndexBot’s public Telegram description), while others structure reporting over 4–14 days. (Telegram) In practice, you should judge in windows (24h, 72h, 7d, 14d), not minutes.
Should I index every backlink I build?
No. Start with the links you actually want counted—relevant, stable pages on sites that are likely to remain indexed. Indexing low-value links faster doesn’t turn them into high-quality links.
What types of backlinks benefit most from indexing?
Common high-ROI targets include local citations, profiles, press releases, guest posts, directory listings, and pages on sites that are slow to get crawled naturally.
Are backlink indexers safe for client sites?
Safety depends on the method, the quality of your backlinks, and your risk tolerance. Tools that emphasize direct submission/crawler interaction and transparent reporting tend to be safer than tools that describe aggressive “pyramid” mechanics.
How do I choose between cheap bulk indexers and premium indexers?
Use cheap bulk indexers when volume matters and your link set is broad. Use premium tools when you’re indexing smaller batches of high-value links and want better reporting/refund mechanics.
What’s the best workflow for indexing local citations?
A practical loop is:
- Run an index check on the citation URLs
- Submit only the non-indexed ones
- Re-check after a few days
- Re-submit only the stubborn-but-worthwhile URLs
IndexChex is designed to support that exact operational pattern at scale. (IndexChex)
If you want the fastest “operator workflow” (check + submit + re-check) with aggressive at-scale pricing, start here: IndexChex.
